Dead kids bleeding on wooden pikes! Will the ideas never cease? Seriously though, this latest non-controversy does at least invite a conversation about how we're supposed to view violence in games where the whole point is to stick pointy things into others and take their money. How do we enjoy this and have any issue with Kids on Pikes?
Birth, sex, and death are part of the human condition and impossible to ignore. If you’re reading this paragraph, you were born. And if you aren’t having sex now, the smart money says you’re the product of it (and very likely seeking your next encounter). Our desire to survive and reproduce is indelibly hardwired, so much so that we omit these things from our narratives to our peril and to the detriment of the concepts we hope to explore...
I get it. I'm not some prude who wants to play tea party. Orcs pillage the countryside, slaughtering all in their path. Lust reduces men to quivering jelly, makes them the lovers of demons (or maybe their own sisters in Caligula's case) and worse yet, predators of the topical sort who populate our news cycles all too often. Indeed, these realities elevate our fiction and our games, and their omission would suck the humanity out of our efforts and leave a huge, unsatisfying hole in its wake. Candyland doesn't interest me.
But that's the rub, isn't it? When do our narratives go from being stories about humanity which just happen to involve death and sex, even if prominently, and when do they become death and sex for its own sake divorced from any context? This distinction matters...
So first, let's partition sex and violence. Sex between consenting adults is nothing to oppose or censor so long as it's basically responsible and hurts no one. But once it becomes non-consensual it devolves into violence. And let's extricate death because this, in and of itself, is the natural end of our cycle, however painful it can be to the survivors. We can disentangle these things and distill that which any considerate human should rightly reject...
Namely, the suffering of others as an end unto itself and offered up as entertainment or a clever marketing strategy. And this is why I'm ultimately turned off by Kids on Pikes.
Pain and suffering are things that happen in our narratives. That doesn't mean we should find them cool or entertaining for their own sake. Now I totally get that the grindhouse genre playfully exploits blood-spattering gore. It's basically dark humor, and I was raised on the excellent Creepy and Eerie horror comics of the 1970s. But these stories were surprisingly moralistic in their approach and never suggested that we should enjoy, much less find humor, in the suffering of helpless innocents, as horrific as they could sometimes be...
Feel free to disagree. Free country. For fans of Raggi's work, it's entirely consistent with an unbroken trend and maybe even good marketing. But for adult gamers, human suffering shouldn't be amusing or diversionary fare. Not when real children die in depressing numbers every day. I don't care for (most) Quentin Tarantino movies because only a pampered and protected millionaire would find graphic suffering amusing*. Again, that's just me.
There's no easy way to partition the fact of violence and the enjoyment of it, especially when the lines are so easily blurred. We're rightly horrified at actual violence against children, including James Raggi (who obviously doesn't condone it), while simultaneously devouring splatter flicks. It's the whole duality of man thing. But live long enough and see enough actual suffering firsthand, and maybe the smile fades a little and we move on; and this is the slow and inevitable "death" of shock. These tactics will eat themselves alive...
*From Dusk til Dawn and Pulp Fiction were decent, but the victims sort of had it coming!
0 Yorumlar